Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,113 Carolyn O. Goldman v. Northrop Corp., Nominal Ernst and Ernst, R. P. Colley, Thomas J. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 28, 1979No. 77-2755PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge:
On April 21, 1975, appellant Goldman, a shareholder in Northrop Corporation, brought this shareholders’ derivative action in the Central District of California. The action was brought on behalf of Northrop, which was made a nominal defendant. The complaint alleged that the individual defendants, officers and directors of Northrop, had secretly converted and wasted corporate funds for illegal purposes believed to include the making of “bribes to foreign governments, payoffs to certain individuals * * * and unreported and illegal fees and sales commissions * * Violations…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- John J. Flynn, and v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Earl E. Pope, Executive Secretary, and Does I Through V, Inclusive, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Julius H. Reiter v. Universal Marion CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,484 John F. Maher v. Zapata Corporation v. William Maldonado, Objector-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Lawrence Arduini v. IgtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- California State Teachers' Retirement System v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- In re JPMorgan Chase Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Young-Henderson v. Spartanburg Area Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.