Legal Opinion
Forest Guardians v. Babbitt
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1998No. 97-2370PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
In 1991, the administrative process was set in motion to list the Rio Grande silvery minnow as an endangered species and designate its critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and its subsequent amendments (“ESA” or “Act”). In July 1994, the Secretary of the Interior (“Secretary”) listed the fish as an endangered species, but failed to issue a rule regarding its critical habitat. By statute, a final rule designating the silvery minnow’s critical habitat was due March 1, 1995. That date passed without a critical habitat designation, and to date the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Forest Guardians v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Yue Yu v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
- Forest Guardians v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Org. for Competitive Markets v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Saleem v. KeislerDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.