Legal Opinion

W. J. Byrnes & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 17, 1972No. C.R.D. 72-5PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

I believe a short memorandum to accompany this order is desirable to clarify the use and abuse of the motion for rehearing.

A rehearing may be proper when there has been some error or irregularity in the trial, a serious evidentiary ñaw, a discovery of important new evidence which was not available, even to the diligent party, at the time of trial, or an occurrence at trial in the nature of an accident or unpredictable surprise or unavoidable mistake which severely impaired a party’s ability to adequately present its case. In short, a rehearing is a method of rectifying a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corham Artificial Flower Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  2. Retamal v. United States Customs & Border Protection, Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  4. Mita Copystar America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  5. Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API