Legal Opinion
Mita Copystar America, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 25, 1998No. Slip Op. 98-2. Court No. 93-03-00159PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Judge:
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion for rehearing and reconsideration. Plaintiff, Mita .Copystar America (“Mita”), moves under USCIT R. 59(a) for a rehearing of Mita Copystar America, Inc. v. United States, (“Mita II”), — CIT -, 966 F.Supp. 1245 (1997), holding that toner cartridges are properly classified as “chemical preparations for photographic uses,” under subheading 3707.90.30, HTSUS (Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States).
Plaintiff submits that in Mita II the Court erred in its analysis of the applicable law and, furthermore, that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Quigley & Manard, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- W. J. Byrnes & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Union Camp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- BMT Commodity Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Usec, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- NEC Corp. v. Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Papierfabrik August Koehler SE v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Mita Copystar America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.