Legal Opinion

Corham Artificial Flower Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 28, 1970No. C.D. 4109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WatsoN, Judge:

These protests, consolidated for the purpose of trial, place in issue the classification of certain articles invoiced as plastic artificial flowers. The merchandise was classified pursuant to item 748.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as “ [a] rtificial flowers, trees, * * *: [w]holly or almost wholly of plastics.” Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly classifiable pursuant to item 774.60 of said tariff schedules as other “[a]rticles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics.”

It has been stipulated by the parties that the instant merchandise is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cochran Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Armbee Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Zunold Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Moore International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. W. J. Byrnes & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API