Douglas Milhauser v. Minco Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
After Douglas Milhauser’s employment was terminated by Mineo Products, Inc. (Mineo) as part of a reduction in force, he brought this action under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq., a statute requiring that returning veterans be reemployed in an appropriate position. The case was tried to a jury which found for Mineo. Milhauser then moved for judgment as a matter of law, arguing that there was not a legally sufficient basis for the verdict because termination is not a valid reemployment position *270under the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rockport Pharmacy, Inc. v. Digital Simplistics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Two Rivers Bank & Trust v. Vanya AtanasovaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hanson v. County of KitsapDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Linda A. Miller v. Huron Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Keslosky v. Borough of Old ForgeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- White Communications v. Synergies3 Tec ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Christopher Wright v. Byron Financial, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.