Legal Opinion

Douglas Milhauser v. Minco Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2012No. 12-1756PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

After Douglas Milhauser’s employment was terminated by Mineo Products, Inc. (Mineo) as part of a reduction in force, he brought this action under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq., a statute requiring that returning veterans be reemployed in an appropriate position. The case was tried to a jury which found for Mineo. Milhauser then moved for judgment as a matter of law, arguing that there was not a legally sufficient basis for the verdict because termination is not a valid reemployment position *270under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Rockport Pharmacy, Inc. v. Digital Simplistics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Two Rivers Bank & Trust v. Vanya AtanasovaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hanson v. County of KitsapDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
  2. Linda A. Miller v. Huron Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  3. Keslosky v. Borough of Old ForgeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. White Communications v. Synergies3 Tec ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. Christopher Wright v. Byron Financial, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API