Legal Opinion
Kaeppler v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 26, 1961No. Civ. A. 25618PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a! motion for a protective order under F.R.Civ.P. rule 30(b), 28 U.S.C.A., to stay the taking by defendants of the deposition of Bronne A. Bruzgo, Jr., vice presideht of Summit Hill Marble & Granite Co., Inc., one of the plaintiffs. Bruzgo has also been subpoenaed and by duces tecum has been directed to produce Summit’s books and records. Except for this and outstanding interrogatories propounded to plaintiffs to which a number of objections have been made, defendants’ discovery is completed.
The suit is a class action by monument dealers in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. LustigDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wendkos v. ABC Consolidated Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. Wedco, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1984
- Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Roberts, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1979