Legal Opinion
Wendkos v. ABC Consolidated Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 7, 1965No. Civ. A. Nos. 38542, 38543PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.. Both plaintiffs and defendants in these related cases have made motions for protective orders pursuant to Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party now claims to have the exclusive right to go forward with depositions.
The facts are not in dispute. The complaint was filed and 20 days later the plaintiffs filed a Notice of Deposition with the Clerk of the court (Document 3). This notice was not served on the defendants at the time of filing. Thereafter the defendants made an appearance and simultaneously filed and served a notice for depositions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Caldwell-Clements, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Pub. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Stover v. Universal Moulded Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Kaeppler v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Buren v. ScheinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parkhurst v. KlingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- McDowell v. Ball (In Re McDowell)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1994
- Suplee, Yeatman, Mosley Co. v. ShapiroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966