Legal Opinion

Berko v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a *595proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), entered April 4, 2002, which denied their motion for leave to amend notices of claim.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, and the petitioners’ amended notices of claim will be deemed served upon service on the respondents of a copy of this decision and order.

The petitioners moved by order to show cause pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (6) for leave to serve…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Zinnamon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Formanek v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gatewood v. Poughkeepsie Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Puzio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Lin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Sanchez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API