Legal Opinion

Formanek v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated July 8, 1991, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended notice of claim and amended complaint and denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff moved pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (6) for leave to serve an amended notice of claim to correct the date of the accident listed in the original notice of claim. We find that the error was not made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Toro v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Puzio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Lin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Bowers v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Berko v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API