Legal Opinion
Puzio v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 19, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e, in effect, for leave to amend a notice of claim, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated April 20, 2005, which denied their application.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the application is granted, and the petitioners’ amended notice of claim is deemed served.
General Municipal Law § 50-e (6) authorizes a court, in its discretion, to grant leave to serve an amended notice of claim where the error in the original notice of claim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zinnamon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Formanek v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Lin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Rosetti v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Berko v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gatewood v. Poughkeepsie Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Bowers v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Copeland v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ming v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Pelaez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.