Legal Opinion
Norman SCHULER and Grace J. Schuler, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. POLAROID CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 21, 1988No. 87-1895PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, Circuit Judge.
Norman and Grace Schuler sued Polaroid Corporation claiming that Polaroid violated federal and state ‘age discrimination’ laws, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1982); Mass.Gen.L. ch. 151B, §§ 1-10 (1986) by “constructively discharging” Norman in the summer of 1985. The district court granted Polaroid's motion for summary judgment; the Schulers appeal; we affirm. The questions presented are all evidentiary. Did the Schulers bring to the district court’s attention enough evidence to show “genuine” and “material” issues of fact, evidence that would have legally permitted a jury to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Mayor of Philadelphia v. Educational Equality LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Israel Alicea Rosado v. Ramon Garcia SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. ClineSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Jorge VEGA and Eusebio Leon, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. KODAK CARIBBEAN, LTD., Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Andrew P. Hebert v. The Mohawk Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Dominguez v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1997
- Mitchell v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.