Legal Opinion
Tudor v. Department of the Treasury
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 9, 2011No. 2009-3237Published
1Opinion of the Court
639 F.3d 1362 (2011)
Roger TUDOR, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY, Respondent.
No. 2009-3237.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 9, 2011.
Lawrence A. Berger, Mahon & Berger, Glen Cove, NY, argued for petitioner.
Matthew H. Solomson, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Kirk T. Manhardt, Assistant Director.
Before BRYSON, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.
Opinion for the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Robert A. Bieber v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Leatherbury v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Lloyd H. Holmes v. Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Tudor v. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.