Legal Opinion

Azbill v. Lexington Mfg. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

Since this is an appeal from the decree of the Chancellor sustaining a demurrer to the bill, the allegations of that hill, conclusions excepted, will be stated as the facts.

Complainants, appellants here, are taxpayers of the town of Lexington. That municipality and the Lexington Manufacturing Company, Inc., a Tennessee corporation, are the defendants. The prayer of the bill is for a decree adjudging void two contracts contemporaneously entered into between the two defendants. Identical demurrers were filed by each defendant, whereby it is asserted that (1) no equity is shown on the face of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Albritton v. City of WinonaMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Patton v. ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Reams v. Board of Mayor AldermenTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Ferrell v. DoakTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Green v. City of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Faulconer v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
  4. Faulconer v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  5. Holly v. City of ElizabethtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API