Legal Opinion

United States v. James Van Buren

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1986No. 86-1159PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant James Van Burén (“defendant”) appeals his guilty plea to the charge of knowingly, intentionally, and unlawfully using a communication facility to commit or facilitate a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine. He claims that his guilty plea should be set aside on three grounds. First, defendant argues that the District Court failed to establish a factual basis for the guilty plea, thus failing to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(f). Second, he claims that he lacked full understanding of the elements of the crime with which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. Winston Eugene DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. George Richard Heiden, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. Ruben Garza CoronadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. Marvin GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. LalondeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Francisco J. Parra-IbanezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. State v. BarbozaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. United States v. Latroy D. Ray, Johnny Lee May, and Boyd McChristionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API