Legal Opinion

Hamblen v. Placid Oil Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1955No. 3239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

" This is a suit filed by plaintiff Tolar N. Hamblen against defendants John Mecom and Placid Oil Company for $11,690.35, alleged to be the balance of the purchase price of an assignment of an oil, gas and ■mineral lease, which was assigned by Ham-blen to Mecom. Defendants brought into the suit A. D. Hawkins and J. H. Byerly. Hawkins and Byerly filed pleadings to the effect that each owned a ⅛ interest in the •cause of action asserted by Hamblen.

This case involves the construction ■of the provisions of an oil, gas and mineral lease covering 11,690.35 = acres of'land in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. VidalTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Gray v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Arcadia Refining Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Moore v. Marland Oil Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
  2. Mecom v. HamblenTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Mecom v. HamblenTexas Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API