Legal Opinion
Hamblen v. Placid Oil Company
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 28, 1955No. 3239PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
" This is a suit filed by plaintiff Tolar N. Hamblen against defendants John Mecom and Placid Oil Company for $11,690.35, alleged to be the balance of the purchase price of an assignment of an oil, gas and ■mineral lease, which was assigned by Ham-blen to Mecom. Defendants brought into the suit A. D. Hawkins and J. H. Byerly. Hawkins and Byerly filed pleadings to the effect that each owned a ⅛ interest in the •cause of action asserted by Hamblen.
This case involves the construction ■of the provisions of an oil, gas and mineral lease covering 11,690.35 = acres of'land in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. VidalTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Gray v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Arcadia Refining Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Moore v. Marland Oil Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
- Mecom v. HamblenTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Mecom v. HamblenTexas Supreme Court · 1956