Legal Opinion

Mecom v. Hamblen

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1956No. A-5380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Culver

Respondent, Hamblen, sued petitioner, Mecom, and Placid Oil Company for $11,690.35, claimed to be the balance of the purchase price for an oil and gas lease assigned by Hamblen to Mecom, and by Mecom to Placid. A. D. Hawkins and J. H. Byerly each as cross-plaintiffs plead for one-third of the amount claimed by Hamblen.

The trial court, without the intervention of a jury, at the conclusion of petitioner’s case granted defendant’s motion on all points and entered a take-nothing judgment against the three parties plaintiff.

The Court of Civil Appeals has reversed and rendered for Hamblen and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Fowler v. HultsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hamblen v. Placid Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BonillaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Anderson v. EliotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Moore v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API