Legal Opinion

Mecom v. Hamblen

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1956No. A-5380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULVER, Justice.

Respondent, Plamblen, sued petitioner, Mecom, and Placid Oil Company for $11,-690.35, claimed to be the balance of the purchase price for an oil and gas lease assigned by Hamblen to Mecom, and by Me-com to Placid. A. D. Hawkins and J. H. Byerly each as cross-plaintiffs plead for one-third of the amount claimed by Plam-blen.

The trial court, without the intervention of a jury, at the conclusion of petitioner’s case granted defendant’s motion on all points and entered a take-nothing judgment against the three parties plaintiff.

The Court of Civil Appeals has reversed and rendered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Fowler v. HultsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Harriss v. RitterTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hamblen v. Placid Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BonillaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Anderson v. EliotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Moore v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API