Mecom v. Hamblen
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CULVER, Justice.
Respondent, Plamblen, sued petitioner, Mecom, and Placid Oil Company for $11,-690.35, claimed to be the balance of the purchase price for an oil and gas lease assigned by Hamblen to Mecom, and by Me-com to Placid. A. D. Hawkins and J. H. Byerly each as cross-plaintiffs plead for one-third of the amount claimed by Plam-blen.
The trial court, without the intervention of a jury, at the conclusion of petitioner’s case granted defendant’s motion on all points and entered a take-nothing judgment against the three parties plaintiff.
The Court of Civil Appeals has reversed and rendered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Fowler v. HultsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Harriss v. RitterTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Hamblen v. Placid Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taylor v. BonillaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Anderson v. EliotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Moore v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967