Williams v. Hirshorn
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the District Court of the city of Camden.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Trenchard, J.
The plaintiff below sued to recover the balance 'alleged to be due on his contract with the defendant wherein the plaintiff agreed to make the walls of the defendant’s cellars waterproof, and the latter agreed to pay $50 upon completion, “the balance ($50) to he paid after a rain and a satisfactory test has been made.”
We are of the opinion that the judgment for the plaintiff rendered by the trial judge sitting without a jury must be affirmed.
We think the motion to nonsuit was properly denied and that a jury question was presented at the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- San Bernardino Valley Water Development Co. v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Fitzmaurice v. Van Vlaanderen MacH. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Urban Farms, Inc. v. SeelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Anderson v. Sheehan-Bartling, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Grobarchik v. Nasa Mortgage and Investment Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.