Legal Opinion
Manns v. ArvinMeritor, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 5, 2003No. 3:02-cv-07430PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This cases arises under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and the disability discrimination provision of the Ohio Civil Rights Act. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332. Pending is Defendant ArvinMeritor’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Virgil “Blake” Manns began working for defendant ArvinMeritor Inc.’s predecessor, Rockwell International Corp., in 1993. In 1998, Plaintiff was diagnosed with narcolepsy, which is a sleeping disorder that causes frequent brief…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bradley v. Mary Rutan Hospital Assoc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- Banks v. Bosch Rexroth Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Dortman v. ACO Hardware, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Figgins v. Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Michigan, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- MARSH v. ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.