Legal Opinion

Mines v. Phee

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Probate Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles S. Cutting, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Upon application by the administratrix of the estate of Hugh L. Mines for authority to sell a part of his real estate for the payment of debts, his widow, Mary Mines, claimed dower. The probate court of Cook county made a decree of sale denying the widow’s right. The only question upon this appeal is the sufficiency of an alleged ante-nuptial contract to bar the widow’s dower.

The decedent and the appellant were married on October 26, 1898, and two days before that event they signed and acknowledged, in duplicate, a. written agreement, by the terms of which they mutually released all dower…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warner v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hessick v. HessickIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. MerlinoWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Enyart v. EnyartNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Denison v. DawesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
  4. Brown v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Parker v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API