Legal Opinion
Melman v. Montefiore Medical Center
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 29, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Friedman, J.P.
Plaintiff Arnold Melman, M.D., was hired as chairman of defendant Montefiore Medical Center’s urology department in *1121988, when he was 47 years old. In 2007, when he was 66, he commenced this action against Montefiore, asserting causes of action for age discrimination and retaliation in violation of the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107 [1] [a]; [7]).1 Although plaintiff remains in his position as chairman of the urology department, he alleges that Montefiore has discriminated against him on the basis of his age, and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Holcomb v. Iona CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the BlindNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bloomberg L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Williams v. MTA Bus Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Reed v. Nike, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019