Legal Opinion
Stell v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided July 22, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 2375PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McMILLAN, District Judge.
This matter was heard upon motion of the defendant for summary judgment based upon the contention that the suit is barred by pertinent statutes of limitation. The motion is denied. The pertinent facts are found to be as follows:
In November, 1964, New Dixie Lines, Inc., a freight hauler, employer of the plaintiff, bought and took delivery of a truck tire from the defendant Firestone. The place of delivery is not revealed. New Dixie, the plaintiff alleges, had ordered a tire made of nylon cord and the tire delivered was made of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Hocutt v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Robert William Sides v. Richard MacHine Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Green v. MTD Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1970
- Shuler v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976