Legal Opinion

Green v. MTD Products, Inc.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1970No. C-82-G-69PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EDWIN M. STANLEY, Chief Judge.

The defendants, MTD Products, Inc. and the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, have moved, pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order dismissing this action, or entering judgment on the pleadings in their favor, upon the ground that the plaintiff’s alleged cause of action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The motion is granted for the reasons hereinafter set forth.

The pertinent facts may be briefly summarized. Defendant, MTD Products, Inc., is engaged in the manufacture and sale of rotary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Robert William Sides v. Richard MacHine Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  3. Leslie S. Barnes, Jr. v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  4. Land v. Neill Pontiac, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Stell v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Mobil Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  2. Thomas William Green v. M. T. D. Products, Inc. And the Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API