Dutch Village Mall, LLC v. Pelletti
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
¶1 A limited liability company (LLC) must be represented by a lawyer in order to litigate. This is simply an application of the general rule prohibiting laypersons from representing other persons or entities in court proceedings. Because a layperson does not have a lawyer’s professional skills or ethical responsibilities, such representation imposes undue burdens on opposing parties and the courts. These considerations are just as important when the LLC has only one owner. We affirm an order requiring the appellant LLC to obtain legal representation in order to pursue its claim of unpaid rent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lattanzio v. ComtaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Advocates for Responsible Development v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Lloyd Enterprises, Inc. v. Longview Plumbing & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- David R. Nicholson, Builder, LLC v. JablonskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Cottringer v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Smith v. Rustic Home Builders, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- No On I-502, Arthur West v. NormlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.