No On I-502, Arthur West v. Norml
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtJohanson, J.
¶1 — Arthur West appeals a superior court order dismissing his complaint that alleged a violation of the Fair Campaign Practices Act (FCPA), ch. 42.17A RCW. The superior court ruled that West could not bring an FCPA action as a self-represented (pro se) litigant because the FCPA requires that such actions be maintained in the name of the State. West argues that the trial court erred by dismissing his suit because the FCPA contemplates that individuals may file “citizen’s actions” under the statute without representation of legal counsel. Although the FCPA speaks of “persons” and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stoner v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Onan (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Advocates for Responsible Development v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Utter v. Building Industry Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re The Guardianship Of: Ella Nora Denny Thomas Anderson, App. v. Ohana Fiduciary Corp., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Libby Haines-marchel, Et Ano, App v. Wa State Liquor & Cannabis Board, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- No on 1-502 v. Wash. NORMLWashington Supreme Court · 2016