Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Barnett
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 24, 1996No. Civil Action 95-201PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BUCKWALTER, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs in this putative civil rights class action claim to be persons who had been receiving medical benefits pursuant to the Pennsylvania Worker’s Compensation Law, and who were thereafter deprived of those benefits without prior notice or an opportunity to be heard pursuant to what plaintiffs’ counsel characterize as an “automatic super-sedeas” as provided by Section 306(f.l)(5) of the aforesaid law, as amended, 77 P.S. 531(5) (Supp.1994), which provides in part as follows:
The employer or insurer shall make payment and providers shall…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sullivan v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Key v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Sullivan v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998