Arizonans for Fair Elections v. Hobbs
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Arizonans for Fair Elections, et al., No. CV-20-00658-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Katie Hobbs, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On April 4, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that certain statutes governing 16 Arizona’s citizen initiative process, which appear in Title 19 of the Arizona Revised 17 Statutes, constitute an unconstitutional inhibition of their First and Fourteenth Amendment 18 rights in light of the state and local responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. (Doc. 1.) 19 Specifically,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alisal Water Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Nancy Anne Spangler, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.