Legal Opinion

State v. Mottet

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1968No. 39252PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This is a filiation proceeding tried to the court. The evidence was in conflict on the question whether the mother had intercourse with the defendant during the critical conception period.

The defendant contends that the trial court should have rejected the testimony of the mother and should have believed the testimony of the defense witnesses, presumably because they were greater in number. Instead the court chose to believe the mother. In spite of the fact that the defense presented the greater number of witnesses, this was within its province. Galbraith v. Devlin, 85 Wash. 482, 148 Pac. 589…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TiemanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hughes & Co. v. FlintWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. In re WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State v. KratzerWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Galbraith v. DevlinWashington Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. State v. KlinkerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. State v. JuddUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API