Legal Opinion

State v. Tieman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1903No. 4572PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Skagit County. — Hon. George A. Joiner, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, C. J.

This is a bastardy proceeding, begun in the superior court of Skagit county by one John Jungquist, who alleged in his complaint that an unmarried woman (naming her) was pregnant with child, which, if born alive, would be a bastard, and charged the appellant with being the father of such unborn child. Summons was duly issued and served on the appellant, after which he appeared in the action and demurred to the complaint on various grounds, some of which went to the jurisdiction of the court.' On his demurrer being overruled, he pleaded…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Marston v. HumesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re CannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Young v. MakepeaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. In re WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ethics Commission v. CullisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. State v. SpeedWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. BlaineWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Carvin v. BritainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API