Legal Opinion

Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1955No. Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 46,355PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Butzbl, J;

Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, plaintiff, brought suit against the city of Detroit claiming implied indemnity for the sum of $13,174.20 which plaintiff paid its employee,' Kenneth S. Tasker. Defendant had caused a sign to be attached to a utility pole which was contiguous to plaintiff’s track where it crossed St. Aubin street in the city of Detroit. It was a “No Left Turn” sign, 32 inches by 40 inches in size and was attached to the pole some 11 feet from the ground, the edge of the sign being 7.1 feet from a perpendicular rising from the center line of the track at a point…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Village of Portland v. Citizens Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Northrup v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Springer v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Buhler v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Selden v. Village of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morgan v. McDermottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Penix v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Mikelsavage v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Fulco, Inc. v. Martin Tropf & Sons, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Lenz v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API