Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Princeton Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 3, 1962No. [No. 271, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSybert, J.

This case involves two appeals arising out of separate suits brought against the owners of a tract of land on Mayfield Avenue in Baltimore City which has been the subject of protracted litigation and a previous decision by this Court, in Restivo v. Princeton Constr. Co., 223 Md. 516, 165 A. 2d 766 (1960). In that case it was held that the Baltimore City Zoning Ordinance required every house or lot in a development plan to front on a public street at least thirty feet wide; that the Princeton Construction Company, which originally sought to develop the tract, had violated the Ordinance by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Windsor Hills Improvement Ass'n v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  2. Purvis v. BuseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Restivo v. Princeton Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Illinois Cent. R. v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Adventist Healthcare Midatlantic, Inc. v. Suburban Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. M. of Baltimore & Mahoney v. SwinskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Dougherty v. Quality Pacific Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Viles v. Board of Municipal and Zoning AppealsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API