Legal Opinion

M. of Baltimore & Mahoney v. Swinski

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 11, 1964No. [No. 287, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether the zoning ordinance of Baltimore City requires the physical front of a building to face the street side of a lot.

Two lots are involved. Both are owned by John and Betty Mahoney (the Mahoneys). One lot, known as 5900 Loch Raven Boulevard, is located at the northwest corner of the boulevard and Gleneagle Road, and measures 80 feet by 130 feet, with the short side facing on the west side of the boulevard and the long side binding on the north side of the road. The other lot, known as 5904 Loch Raven Boulevard, is located 153.5 feet north…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian ChurchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Restivo v. Princeton Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Howland v. AndrusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  4. Bianco v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Building Inspector v. McInerneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owen v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Swoboda v. WilderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API