Legal Opinion

Dougherty v. Quality Pacific Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 20, 1971No. 588-1Published

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Edwin and Velva Dougherty brought suit claiming a carport, owned by defendants Beckwith, was built in violation of a restrictive covenant which required various structures to be set back 20 feet from the front line of property subject to the covenant.

The trial court identified the southwest boundary of defendants’ property as the front property line and issued a mandatory injunction requiring defendants’ carport to be set back 20 feet from that line. The defendants' appeal.

We hold the trial court erred in its determination of the location of the front property line, and appellants are not in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Town of Marblehead v. DeeryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. Proctor v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. Princeton Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API