Deutsch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, Judge.
This is an action on an automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff to recover for a total loss to plaintiff’s automobile. Plaintiff’s theory of recovery is that plaintiff’s son stole plaintiff’s automobile and wrecked it. Plaintiff sued under the comprehensive coverage *824provision of the policy insuring against loss to the automobile resulting from theft. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $2,700.
The trial court sustained defendant’s after-trial motion for judgment in accordance with its motion for a directed verdict and in the alternative…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. CoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Burch v. WargoMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Daniel v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
- Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Hossley v. Union Indemnity Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MacAlco, Inc. v. Gulf Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Garza v. Glen Falls InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- Ranger Insurance Co. v. AilshireMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Seales v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Spell v. Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994