Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Department of Securities ex rel. Faught v. Wilcox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 11, 2011No. 109,111PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.

1 This is a second appeal resulting from a Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Marsha Schubert, operating as Schubert and Associates (Schubert). The facts are set forth in the first appeal, Dept. Of Securities ex rel. Faught v. Blair, 2010 OK 16, 231 P.3d 645 (Blair). The defendants herein, Marvin and Pamela Wilcox, were among the appellants in Blair appealing from summary judgments obtained by the plaintiffs on the theory of unjust enrichment against 158 "relief" defendants who had received more money than they invested in the Ponzi scheme.1 Plaintiffs had sought to recover all amounts the relief…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Runyon v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Spirgis v. Circle K Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Steiger v. City National Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Harmon v. CradduckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. DANI v. MILLERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. Oklahoma Department of Securities Ex Rel. Faught v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Moon v. McDonald, Carano & Wilson, L.L.P.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Marriage of Schweigert v. SchweigertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API