Steiger v. City National Bank of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
PER CÜRlAM:
Reference rwill he made to the parties as they appeared in the court below, wherein plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendant in orior was plaintiff.
Superior Products, Inc., hereinafter designated as Superior, and owned wholly by defendants, A. R. Steiger and Marie N. Steiger, was engaged in the sale of household appliances, including television receivers and like articles, to the general public upon conditional sales contracts. On or about November 1, 1960, Superior allegedly executed a Recourse Agreement under the terips of which it agreed to sell to plaintiff contracts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Manos v. LecheSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Lindsey v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Wynn v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Sand Springs Railway Co. v. PiggeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Sautbine v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Reddell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Jernigan v. JerniganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.