Legal Opinion

Mathel v. Josephine County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1993No. WCB 90-18752; CA A76236Published

1Opinion of the Court

858 P.2d 450 (1993)

122 Or. App. 424

In the Matter of the Compensation of Jerry B. Mathel, Claimant.

Jerry B. MATHEL, Petitioner,

v.

JOSEPHINE COUNTY, Respondent.

WCB 90-18752; CA A76236.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted March 15, 1993.

Resubmitted July 14, 1993.

Decided August 25, 1993.

Reconsideration Denied November 10, 1993.

Karsten H. Rassmussen, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Michael M. Bruce, Eugene.

Michael G. Bostwick, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Davis & Bostwick, Portland.

Resubmitted in Banc…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Heino v. HarperOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. SAIF Corp. v. HukariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Oregon School Activities Ass'n v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Mathel v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API