Williams v. Williamson Truck Lines, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from the denial of a motion for new trial. The only issue is the inadequacy of the damages awarded.
The cases of Stephen Williams and his wife, Lugrether Williams were consolidated for trial and for appeal. The cases arose out of an automobile accident. After trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of Stephen Williams in the amount of $5,515.59 and one in favor of Mrs. Williams in the amount of $1,224.40. Motion for new trial on the inadequacy of each verdict was denied.
The essence of plaintiffs' argument is that the amounts of the verdicts are precisely the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Yarbrough v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Prescott v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. RandleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Stone v. EcholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- O'DANIELS BY AND THROUGH O'DANIELS v. BatesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Griffin v. BattlesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Daniel v. AdkinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Free v. PalmerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Barnett v. SainCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.