Legal Opinion

Mickey v. Stratton

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided May 5, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action [by Robert Mickey against Julius A. Stratton] to recover possession of real property.

1Opinion of the Court

DEADY, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover the possession of the east half of lots 1 and 2 in block 20, and the whole of block 15, in the town of Salem, and damages for the detention of the same.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a citizen of the state of Pennsylvania and the defendant of the state of Oregon; that the plaintiff is the owner in fee of the premises, and entitled to the possession of the same, which the defendant wrongfully withholds from him to his damage five hundred dollars; and that the premises are of the value of four thousand dollars.

The defendant by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Settlemier v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Marshall v. ShafterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Trullenger v. ToddOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Big Vein Pocahontas Co. v. BrowningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  2. Carroll v. McLarenOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. McDonald v. HannahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1894
  4. Hall v. StevensonOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Griffin v. American Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API