Legal Opinion

A.P.I., Inc. v. Home Insurance

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 30, 2012No. Civil No. 09-975 (JRT/TNL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs A.P.I., Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust and A.P.I., Inc. (collectively “API”) seek to recover from defendants other than Home (collectively “Zurich”) on vicarious and successor liability theories. API now moves for summary judgment on its respondeat superior theory only. Zurich moves for summary judgment on all of API’s claims. Because the Court finds that API’s vicarious and successor liability theories fail as a matter of law, the Court will deny API’s motion for partial summary…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Meyer v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keith Feder, M.D., Inc. v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
  2. Ngiendo v. Young Men's Christian Association of the USADistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
  3. ResCap Liquidating Trust v. LendingTree, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  4. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API