Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Bouck

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1900No. 9,306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court of Dixon county. Heard below before Evans, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of tbe district court of Dixon county reinstating and enforcing, in favor of tbe plaintiff, Michael Farrell, a real estate mortgage which had been, through a mistake of fact, canceled and released of record. Farrell and the defendant, C. D. Ryan, were co-sureties upon a note given by Austin Bouck to the firm of Halstead & Kearney. The mortgage in question, which was executed by Bouck, was held by Ryan as an indemnity against loss resulting from his suretyship. After the note to Halstead & Kearney became due Farrell paid it and took from Ryan an assignment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conner v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Mather v. JenswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. HickenlooperUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Holzmeyer v. Van DorenOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. John Spry Lumber Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Farrell v. BouckNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. First State Savings Bank v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API