Legal Opinion
Martin v. Hickenlooper
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1936No. 5424PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Justice.
This case was formerly decided in favor of appellant Martin [Matrtin v. Hickenlooper, 90 Utah 130, 40 P. (2d) 213], and a rehearing granted September 27, 1935. The following opinion and decision is substituted for the former opinion and decision and the latter recalled:
The appeal was by Martin from a decree giving Mrs. Zorn priority of mortgage lien over his mortgage by virtue of the principle of subrogation. On February 1,1921, while C. H. Stoven was owner of the property, he, together with Florence M. Stoven, his wife, executed a mortgage for $3,500 in favor of the state of…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Emmert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Home Savings Bank v. BierstadtIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Federal Land Bank v. JoynesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. LevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Fleetwood v. Med Center BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.