Legal Opinion · Dissent

Spradling v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1989No. 1031-83Published

1DissentClinton, Judge

The offense is failure to stop and render aid under Article 6701d, §§ 38 and 40, V.A. C.S. At once appellant’s vehicle struck and killed two persons, and he has been twice convicted. In holding that appellant committed two distinct offenses and thus there was no double jeopardy problem, the court of appeals relied on part One of the “landmark case” of Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932). Spradling v. State (Tex.App.—Beaumont No. 09-82-158-CR, September 7, 1983).1

Part One of Blockburger addressed a contention that “two sales charged in the second and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API