Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Fogarty

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 9, 1936No. 25343PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “Courts of ordinary have authority to exercise original, exclusive, and general jurisdiction of the following subject-matters: . . The granting of letters testamentary, and of administration, and the repeal or revocation of the same. . . All controversies in relation to the right of executorship or administration.” Code of 1933, § 24-1901 (2, 3). “Whenever the ordinary knows, or is informed by any person having any interest in the estate, that the administrator . . for any reason . . is unfit for the trust reposed in him,” after citation and hearing, “the ordinary may, in his discretion,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hood v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  2. Wilson v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Leverett v. DismukesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perdue v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Morse v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. McLendon v. McLendonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. McLendon v. McLendonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Bruce v. EveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API