Legal Opinion

Arizona Bank & Trust v. James R. Barrons Trust

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 28, 2015No. 1 CA-CV 13-0096PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CATTANI, Judge:

¶ 1 This case addresses whether Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 33-814(0), which precludes an action to recover a deficiency on a qualifying residential deed of trust, applies to guarantors in the same manner in which it applies to borrowers.1 This court previously held that anti-deficiency protections under § 33-814(G) apply to and cannot be waived by borrowers; we left unanswered, however, whether guarantors are protected by § 33-814(G) as well and, if so, whether guarantors can waive that protection. We now hold that, assuming § 33-814(G) applies to guarantors,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Robert Baker v. University Physicians HealthcareArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Baker v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. American Continental Life Insurance v. Ranier Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. York v. RES-GA LJY, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Aerial Funding v. Van SickleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  3. Becker v. SummitCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. Pnc Bank, National Association v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  5. York v. Res-Ga Ljy, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API