Legal Opinion
Home Builders Ass'n of Greater Chicago v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 30, 2016No. 15 C 8268PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Hoyne Development LLC (“Hoyne”) is a real estate developer. In 2012, Hoyne purchased commercial property in Chicago’s 47th ward, intending to seek re-zoning and develop the property for residential use. Hoyne succeeded in getting the property re-zoned, but as a condition of obtaining budding permits, the City of Chicago demanded that Hoyne comply with its Affordable Requirements Ordinance (“ARO”), a measure to increase the availability of affordable housing in Chicago. Specifically, the City required Hoyne…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pulte Home Corp. v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Strauss v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- Strauss v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- 130 E. Devon, LLC v. Village of Elk GroveDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Anjum v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.