Legal Opinion

Pulte Home Corp. v. Montgomery County

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 26, 2017No. Case No.: GJH-14-3955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GEORGE J. HAZEL, United States District Judge

Pulte Home Corporation and Shiloh Farm Investments, LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), made a substantial investment in 541 acres of undeveloped land in Clarksburg, Maryland in hopes of developing the property. Steps taken by Montgomery County, Maryland (the “County”) and. the. Maryland-National Capital Park *767and Planning Commission (the “Commission” and collectively, “Defendants”) to change zoning, impose new restrictions and delay or deny water and sewer service to Plaintiffs’ property have frustrated Plaintiffs’ efforts and led…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. 1 Fitzwater Street, LLC v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  2. Collision Towing and Auto Body, LLC v. Prince George's County, MDDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  3. Cook v. USAA Federal Savings, BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  4. Frey Agricultural Products, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  5. Hamilton Jewelry LLC v. Twin City Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API