Legal Opinion

United States v. Sylvester Townsend and David Green

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 27, 2002No. 00-4608PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals the district court’s order suppressing evidence and dismissing the indictment obtained against Sylvester Townsend and David Green. During a traffic stop, Ohio state patrolmen called for a drug-sniffing dog and then searched the trunk of the car in which the defendants were traveling. The district court held that, while the traffic stop was permissible, the detention of the automobile and the two defendants until the canine unit arrived, but beyond the time reasonably necessary to issue a traffic citation, was without reasonable suspicion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. United States v. Ricky A. CaruthersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Derrick L. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Torres-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Jaime Perez (04-5440) Walter Rhodes (05-5373)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. BranchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API