Legal Opinion
United States v. Ricky A. Caruthers
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 11, 2006No. 05-5307PublishedCited by 174 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Polster, D. J.,
McKEAGUE, J. (p. 476), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendanb-Appellant Ricky A. Caruthers (“Caruthers”) appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). Caruthers argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to an investigative detention, because the stop was both unjustified in its inception and excessive in its means. He also contends for the first time on appeal that the district court erroneously enhanced his *462sentence under…
2Cases cited114 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- United States v. Jacobo CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Dassault Systemes, SA v. ChildressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Robert Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.